Search Results
7/2/2025, 8:10:50 PM
I saw a clip of James O'Cunt chastising people for being too thick to understand the difference between Lucy Connolly and Bob Vylan.
https://youtu.be/yEltvii1J4M?t=459
He thinks Vylan can't be charged because there's “absolute no likelihood of people leaving Glastonbury and encountering the IDF”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeGp9Z4-eRQ&t=341s
Except, the stirring up racial hatred crimes don't require a threat to be actionable. Nor do they even require a threat. The CPS don't even need someone intended to stir up racial hatred. People like him are still under the impression that Lucy was convicted of actual incitement. Unlike others who claim Vylan wasn't targeting a racial group, O'Cunt actually argues he was and that the link between IDF and Jewish is close. I don't think these idiots realize how broad our speech crimes are.
https://youtu.be/yEltvii1J4M?t=459
He thinks Vylan can't be charged because there's “absolute no likelihood of people leaving Glastonbury and encountering the IDF”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeGp9Z4-eRQ&t=341s
Except, the stirring up racial hatred crimes don't require a threat to be actionable. Nor do they even require a threat. The CPS don't even need someone intended to stir up racial hatred. People like him are still under the impression that Lucy was convicted of actual incitement. Unlike others who claim Vylan wasn't targeting a racial group, O'Cunt actually argues he was and that the link between IDF and Jewish is close. I don't think these idiots realize how broad our speech crimes are.
Page 1