>>509536608
You really can't. Not knowing any personal details about the guy, all you have to go off is what you know from the meeting and from the meeting you know he's better at your job than you are, is more handsome than you are, is more well dressed, has more money and confidence and is basically just superior in every way. That was kind of the point. He was supposed to show these guys what they could be but were not.

The fact that he immediately shut down their objections just proved the point. They tried sparring with him and got slaughtered instantly. He even pre-emptively shut down their "maybe it's not all about money and status" lifeline

>Good father? Fuck you

The only real response is to be so competent he doesn't have to call you out in the first place. Basically, be Roma and then you don't have to be there for this shit

>>211905940
>That’s subjective
Okay Mr. Subjective, tell me which parts you found legitimately funny. I'm guessing there aren't many
>Howard is not a super hero but a Duck from a Duck world that got sent through a portal to the human world.
Yeah, which is why it needed to be funny. If it has no action but it's also not a comedy or a romance or a serious drama, then what the fuck even is it?
>Zoomer brain rot
I saw it in the 80's. It was bad then and it's still bad now
>It was made for kids
And that was a colossal mistake No kid was reading Howard the Duck. Trying to make it a kids' movie is one of the reasons it wound up being this meandering nothingburger of a film. The writers were hamstrung by the rating and all they had let to work with were bad puns

Stop with this Howard the Duck revisionism. No one who's actually seen it is going to fall for your bullshit. Because it's bad.