>>512553006
So you define a computer as something or someone that computes.
Or you define a computer as computation itself.
Or maybe you define a computer as a mathematical operation.
I was thinking more of a general processor that can run arbitrary algorithmic structures, or a specialized one that runs predetermined algorithmic structures.
I think our disagreement is ontological.
But still, I'm always eager to learn. So go ahead and correct me. Even if you're wrong I might learn something.
I suggest you look up the epistemological tool called Leibniz's law/Mereological Reduction/Counterfactual Dependence Testing

>>512552304
Refer to
>>512550975