>>509050433
>highly opinionated with low intellect
Persia, before being Islamised, retained strong traces of the Aryan tripartite structure (à la Dumezil): priest, warrior, producer. The Sasanian Empire, which fell to the Arab conquest, was structured as a sacred monarchy, with fire temples, divine kingship, and hieratic law. After the conquest, many elements of Sasanian imperial ideology and administrative practices were absorbed by the Islamic caliphate, especially under the Abbasids, who moved their court to Baghdad and employed Persian viziers.

Now we just have modern judaeo-marxism.

the Islam of the origins particularly in its aristocratic, solar, and heroic forms has had connections with the Aryo-Iranian tradition, of which it inherited a spirit of ascetic war and inner purification that was gradually submerged by the Levantine and Semitic substrata. if you cannot distinguish between Iranian-Aryan solar kingship and the modern Shia theocracy or modern nation-state of Iran, you are historically illiterate. Persia produced some of the most enduring images of sacred kingship (e.g. Darius, the Fravashi cult, Mithraism) and was far from ‘bugman’ in its metaphysical height, indeed, it was a solar empire. Even the Ottoman empire claimed the inheritance of Rome as 'Qaysar-i-Rum'. Sounds more like revolutionist historical revisionism.

Naturally the Bangla who spams my threads with 'malawan jeet' catchphrases knows nothing outside of his judaeo-marxist theology and represents the lower substrate he so often demonstrates.