Search Results
6/24/2025, 1:11:11 AM
>>508515067
>No enrichment was also the former deal.
No it wasn't. The IAEA was always inspecting their reactors to make sure the enrichment was at low levels.
> So was ballistic range. Breached.
If you're talking about picrel, that was non-binding language.
>Then there was stationing on Israeli border in Syria, and arming terror. The IRGC fired on Israel from Syria. War was inevitable with Israel.
Yeah, but U.S. involvement wasn't inevitable. This is not our war. It is not my job to defend kikes right to colonize somebody else's land.
>No enrichment was also the former deal.
No it wasn't. The IAEA was always inspecting their reactors to make sure the enrichment was at low levels.
> So was ballistic range. Breached.
If you're talking about picrel, that was non-binding language.
>Then there was stationing on Israeli border in Syria, and arming terror. The IRGC fired on Israel from Syria. War was inevitable with Israel.
Yeah, but U.S. involvement wasn't inevitable. This is not our war. It is not my job to defend kikes right to colonize somebody else's land.
Page 1