Search Results
!!m8ZMOnWSI0a/g/106025382#106027507
7/26/2025, 1:18:20 AM
>>106027277
No they don't especially with high end CPUs but it's still a nice thing to have if you want it.
>>106027314
>ffmpeg -i input.jpeg output.webm
Nope, for some reason it must be converted to a webp image first for this to work and then you have to stream loop twice the output webp and a bunch of other bullshit. IF you want the VP9 hardware decoder to actually do its thing else your CPU gets raped. Also H264 isn't as efficient as VP9.
On a related note should I bother hardcoding the required encoding parameters to make these picture webms? I mean it's in my OP and maybe I'm wasting my time...
No they don't especially with high end CPUs but it's still a nice thing to have if you want it.
>>106027314
>ffmpeg -i input.jpeg output.webm
Nope, for some reason it must be converted to a webp image first for this to work and then you have to stream loop twice the output webp and a bunch of other bullshit. IF you want the VP9 hardware decoder to actually do its thing else your CPU gets raped. Also H264 isn't as efficient as VP9.
On a related note should I bother hardcoding the required encoding parameters to make these picture webms? I mean it's in my OP and maybe I'm wasting my time...
Page 1