>>16726965
>Anon, if you don't want to look like a sperg, demonstrate intellectual honesty and explain your issue with cico
>>16726963
>I didn't mention politics at all
I'm talking about your inability to understand nuance and only seeing the world in a binary, retard
>Are you now going to argue you can totally lose weight on 10k kcal/day worth of [insert food you like] but you will get fat if you eat 500 kcal/day of [insert food you dislike]?
no, I never said that
cico fags like you are insufferable because all you do is argue for basic thermodynamics, you are the quintessential midwit
>2+2 is 4 guys, you didn't know that? lol. you are dumb and i am smart
it's wholly uninteresting
nobody cares that you can eat nothing but 1500kcal worth of chocolate everyday and lose weight because the experience of doing that is so torturous that nobody but a cico fag would want to do that just to prove a point that nobody disagrees with
the standard american diet (full of slop) isn't bad because its got a lot of calories, it's bad because its got no nutrients and it's filled with what can essentially be described as drugs
in the most basic of terms, people are eating the same way today as they have been for thousands of years before - they eat what is available to them and it has never been a problem until recently when food products were introduced.
this is a picture of new york in the early 1900s, how many of these people do you think were going to a gym? exercising? counting calories? reading fad diet books? avoiding certain foods? etc the average person didn't even have a fridge at home, boiling down the dietary differences between them and us as "they were just eating less calories bro" is why you are such a massive faggot