>>64003980
>1. It failed to prevent telaviv being hit by a nuclear capable missile. That's a critical threat, you only need to get hit by one.
iran doesn't have nukes
>2. Iran hit you with more missiles than you had counter missiles. Because your hit rate was too low, your redundancy was too high
>you
and clearly not
>3. You ended up using a ton of high value counter missiles in response to low value Iranian scud 3.
you're actually retarded
>And the sum of this was that Iran had proven their capacity to d1 isreal, because the 5 or so missiles the Iranians actually needed to hit, did hit.
>And if they wanted to do that again tomorrow they totally could. If they wanted to use 1500 missiles they totally could, and if they wanted to nuke you, and fire 1500 missiles at you, they totally could.
yeah they surely held back which is why they shot so few