>>149700687
>Oh I thought that was you.
Easy mistake. I've spent so long being the sole supporter of this trend it's still odd to see other people hop on the bandwagon.

>Was starting to wonder since I don't remember the last time I saw one out of these threads.
Billy said he was making a few more for me in a recent thread. Say what will about him, but he is dedicated to feeding my obsession, and I'm very greatful for that.