>>4440861
>not kwik trip
have a pinhole snapshit
>>4440863
>>4440865
A 1:1 shot would be 24" tall; that would be a bit much. Larger than 4x5 would be too much money for me to invest in, and you also lose a lot of variety in film stocks. I would rather continue learning with my 4x5 setup and potentially getting another lens with that before I decide to jump to other large format film sizes; I'm nowhere near pushing the limits of what I have.
But a 1:1 photo enlargement is possible.