Search Results
6/16/2025, 12:57:33 PM
>>17768076
>So you present the accounts of Tacitus and Caesar as definitive proof pederasty
No. I never claimed Tacitus and Caesar made any statement on Celtic pederasty. I provided passages from other authors which mention Celtic pederasty here >>17767847 and can provide more.
>In regards to your obvious spelling errors.
I have spellcheck on. I have not made any spelling errors. This is petty.
>even if we go by your warped view of historical societies -- that being that adult-child rape was ok but adult-adult sex was not
You are so dishonest, you can't even represent the argument of your opponent properly. Pathetic.
>>17768078
The Talmud is the official authorized strategy guide on following the Torah.
>>17768086
>When it comes to an apparently pervasive tradition of child rape, yes it is.
No it isn't. This is an unqualified assertion.
>But many other practices like human sacrifice appear
Gee, I wonder why sacrificing a person in a bog might show up on the archeological record, but a man cumming inside a boy's butt wouldn't!
>just like every other pervasive practice does
You have archeological evidence that Celtic men performed coitus with women? Or that they hugged their children? Or that they hummed melodies? I would love to see it.
>So you present the accounts of Tacitus and Caesar as definitive proof pederasty
No. I never claimed Tacitus and Caesar made any statement on Celtic pederasty. I provided passages from other authors which mention Celtic pederasty here >>17767847 and can provide more.
>In regards to your obvious spelling errors.
I have spellcheck on. I have not made any spelling errors. This is petty.
>even if we go by your warped view of historical societies -- that being that adult-child rape was ok but adult-adult sex was not
You are so dishonest, you can't even represent the argument of your opponent properly. Pathetic.
>>17768078
The Talmud is the official authorized strategy guide on following the Torah.
>>17768086
>When it comes to an apparently pervasive tradition of child rape, yes it is.
No it isn't. This is an unqualified assertion.
>But many other practices like human sacrifice appear
Gee, I wonder why sacrificing a person in a bog might show up on the archeological record, but a man cumming inside a boy's butt wouldn't!
>just like every other pervasive practice does
You have archeological evidence that Celtic men performed coitus with women? Or that they hugged their children? Or that they hummed melodies? I would love to see it.
Page 1