>>95991366
I doubt it, just think it's the closest human reference you can get if you want some elements of a matriarchal society . I wouldn't say western europe was free of all of those variables (17th century europe especially, that's one of the centuries I'd call actively miserable with the 30 years war and cromwell's autism.), but then again this is still in a society where men are the warriors, although you're atleast dealing with monogamy here for the most part.

Other than that, better off with animals IMO.

>>95991415
>Hyenas are a boring choice for a model anyways, especially cause discussions always devolve into "lol psuedo-penis"

Their fault for only focusing on the aspect that should've never evolved then if the animal was slightly more sane when it came to infanticide.

Aren't male lions the fighters anyways though? For prides at least, would the sex ratios be any different from real life or do the males still deal with a billion hurdles?

>>95991439
I just find them interesting as an exception, given the other matriarchal animals don't have females as autistic (Unless they're meerkats)

Your fault for getting into discussions where horses are relevant.