Search Results
7/7/2025, 11:09:58 AM
>>714740984
Where does "breaking the leg of the schools best runner to sabotage that sports teams hopes of bringing trophies to the school, resulting in a diversion of all fundings from a sport which barely even has equipment to his own niche fav sport" fit into his "I was just innocently trying to date one or two students, officer!" plan?
Where does "breaking the leg of the schools best runner to sabotage that sports teams hopes of bringing trophies to the school, resulting in a diversion of all fundings from a sport which barely even has equipment to his own niche fav sport" fit into his "I was just innocently trying to date one or two students, officer!" plan?
7/7/2025, 1:15:22 AM
6/19/2025, 11:27:44 AM
>How does anything in science come about
Attempts at amending holes in theories that fall apart given special cases, or attempts to generalize theories. At least, that's the way I understand it. You don't just construct a working theory entirely from novel first thought. You don't just make up assumptions, there has to be a logical basis--in this case (CONK CREET) pre-established Physics--behind that assumption otherwise you're wasting time and resources proving wild chase of goose.
>It's not like you can randomly apply the scientific method to theories about the nature of existence
My point exactly.
>This would rely on matter being infinite
>we've certainly never observed an 'edge' to existence or confirmed that time is finite
Are you confounding matter with the universe itself?
This whole thread reads like a conversation between freshman Physics students who think they're hot shit, unknowingly about to be raped sweetly by first year course material, and subsequently drop out. Fall came early this year. The poles are shifting!
Attempts at amending holes in theories that fall apart given special cases, or attempts to generalize theories. At least, that's the way I understand it. You don't just construct a working theory entirely from novel first thought. You don't just make up assumptions, there has to be a logical basis--in this case (CONK CREET) pre-established Physics--behind that assumption otherwise you're wasting time and resources proving wild chase of goose.
>It's not like you can randomly apply the scientific method to theories about the nature of existence
My point exactly.
>This would rely on matter being infinite
>we've certainly never observed an 'edge' to existence or confirmed that time is finite
Are you confounding matter with the universe itself?
This whole thread reads like a conversation between freshman Physics students who think they're hot shit, unknowingly about to be raped sweetly by first year course material, and subsequently drop out. Fall came early this year. The poles are shifting!
6/17/2025, 8:28:06 PM
6/16/2025, 1:04:36 AM
the last time my dad played video games was turok on n64. the only game he plays is chess.
Page 1