Search Results
6/12/2025, 6:16:36 PM
>>17755832
>All this being said, convince me that Lee didnt assassinate JFK.
I think he did. I'm open to the idea of there being more than one shooter though. For me the sus stuff is more the context that surrounded the events with the Bay of Pigs.
Oswald being a communist and an ideological believer and also also manipulated by other people with the competely opposite ideology or goals isn't impossible either. It's not the case that someone being ideological makes them immune from being played with by glowies, and I think it might even be more likely among ideological people who go really overboard with it. Autists can have a hard time understanding the intentions of other people. They're not good at social interactions and don't really understand what gaslighting means or can tell when they're being lied to.
It's not your "normie" communist (to the extent there are, but there are some, people who are rooted in some kind of tradition like the labor movement). It's someone who becomes an autistically obsessed and atomized fanatic. It sounds crazy that someone like that could end up in a dirty conspiracy run by anti-communist right-wingers, but it might be more common than you think.
>>17756465
>and that day's paper
An interesting thing about those papers in that photo is that they were two communist papers, the Daily Worker (CPUSA) and The Militant (SWP), even though he was not a member of either organization. And that is kind of strange too because those groups didn't get along. These weren't just organizations you could just join back then either, you had to be invited in, and he didn't get an invite. You could buy a subscription to their papers but they had to know you to let you into the group.
>All this being said, convince me that Lee didnt assassinate JFK.
I think he did. I'm open to the idea of there being more than one shooter though. For me the sus stuff is more the context that surrounded the events with the Bay of Pigs.
Oswald being a communist and an ideological believer and also also manipulated by other people with the competely opposite ideology or goals isn't impossible either. It's not the case that someone being ideological makes them immune from being played with by glowies, and I think it might even be more likely among ideological people who go really overboard with it. Autists can have a hard time understanding the intentions of other people. They're not good at social interactions and don't really understand what gaslighting means or can tell when they're being lied to.
It's not your "normie" communist (to the extent there are, but there are some, people who are rooted in some kind of tradition like the labor movement). It's someone who becomes an autistically obsessed and atomized fanatic. It sounds crazy that someone like that could end up in a dirty conspiracy run by anti-communist right-wingers, but it might be more common than you think.
>>17756465
>and that day's paper
An interesting thing about those papers in that photo is that they were two communist papers, the Daily Worker (CPUSA) and The Militant (SWP), even though he was not a member of either organization. And that is kind of strange too because those groups didn't get along. These weren't just organizations you could just join back then either, you had to be invited in, and he didn't get an invite. You could buy a subscription to their papers but they had to know you to let you into the group.
Page 1