>>509302368
>Your point just isn't very relevant to anything, because it's too obvious
My obvious point was a refutation of a point of yours that was straight up wrong. You then followed up with information that comes down to an elaboration of what I said, rather than a contradiction to it. Female compliance to strong dominant men doesn't mean perfect enthusiastic submission. Of course the feminine reply to open aggression and strength is subtle manipulation and mind games. That's also fairly fucking obvious.