>>527595065
My issue is that the tone he takes(that of a college level 101 book, as you said) is being used in a book that is simultaneously assuming the reader knows what a videogame is since they want to design one but also not at all aware of the basics of videogames. It is simultaneously not sufficiently deep for people wanting to design a game whom are familiar with videogames but if I were also to show it to somebody who had no idea what a videogames was it wouldn't be in-depth enough because it's written like they know what he's talking about. Shit like this might as well be arcane symbols to them