Search Results
7/6/2025, 6:39:07 PM
>>63947568
>Not to mention that Poland is a M346 user but then decided to go with the FA-50
Yeah, and like they explained (L’Europa si arma (28 febbraio 2024) presadiret) they went with it because the FA variant of the M-346 was already queued till 2029 to fullfill the Nigerian, Turkmeni and future Austrian orders and they only cared about having something fast even if they got criticized for not buying european (and they got a deal with the tank aquirement).
>Looking into the future, are we?
I put UAE, Colombia to get a ruse out of you, I know it was disingenuous. my bad. But I still believe that for UK procurement the maturity of the M346 ITS is an advantage compared to platforms that have yet to be integrated.
>But of course you're making shit up and twisting the truth
Such as? Everything I said is backed by evidence which I posted.
>the fact of the matter is that RECENT exports are not in the M346's favor.
Like what? The latest sales in fucking SEA where it's obvious another SEA country has the upper hand? or Spain signing a MOU with Turkey to offload their A400M even when a report from one of their top university literally stated the M-346 was the best choice for Spain? This was a political move (https://www.cud.upct.es/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/S%C3%A1nchez-Lozano_and_Naranjo_ASOC_2020.pdf)
>fanfics about the japs
How is saying that we have a good shot at them a fanfic? We're GCAP partners, they've been training here, their T-X project looks almost exactly like the M-346 and we proposed an exchange agreement for our trainers for the their P1s.
>This proves that whatever advantages the m346 has is either not enough of an advantage or simply irrelevant
That depends on the competition. for the USN? we're in last place. For the UK and Japan? We're most likely ahead of the competition for now.
Remember that you and the other anon are having a meltdown over me saying that I disagree to 2 other anons who both said the only option on the planet is their planes.
>Not to mention that Poland is a M346 user but then decided to go with the FA-50
Yeah, and like they explained (L’Europa si arma (28 febbraio 2024) presadiret) they went with it because the FA variant of the M-346 was already queued till 2029 to fullfill the Nigerian, Turkmeni and future Austrian orders and they only cared about having something fast even if they got criticized for not buying european (and they got a deal with the tank aquirement).
>Looking into the future, are we?
I put UAE, Colombia to get a ruse out of you, I know it was disingenuous. my bad. But I still believe that for UK procurement the maturity of the M346 ITS is an advantage compared to platforms that have yet to be integrated.
>But of course you're making shit up and twisting the truth
Such as? Everything I said is backed by evidence which I posted.
>the fact of the matter is that RECENT exports are not in the M346's favor.
Like what? The latest sales in fucking SEA where it's obvious another SEA country has the upper hand? or Spain signing a MOU with Turkey to offload their A400M even when a report from one of their top university literally stated the M-346 was the best choice for Spain? This was a political move (https://www.cud.upct.es/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/S%C3%A1nchez-Lozano_and_Naranjo_ASOC_2020.pdf)
>fanfics about the japs
How is saying that we have a good shot at them a fanfic? We're GCAP partners, they've been training here, their T-X project looks almost exactly like the M-346 and we proposed an exchange agreement for our trainers for the their P1s.
>This proves that whatever advantages the m346 has is either not enough of an advantage or simply irrelevant
That depends on the competition. for the USN? we're in last place. For the UK and Japan? We're most likely ahead of the competition for now.
Remember that you and the other anon are having a meltdown over me saying that I disagree to 2 other anons who both said the only option on the planet is their planes.
Page 1