>>508248797
Again you people fail to respond to what I have posted. Can you even read? If you fail to bring up anything new that will simply be ignored.
>if you do not chose between A or B then you simply did not pick.
Except that isn't what happened in this case. An atheist under the standard definition doesn't claim he didn't pick between God(s) and no God(s)
>>508250166
Except it isn't, only one of them is the standard definition used in philosophy.
>as I've told can change belief of I'm convinced enough
That does not magically make your belief into a "lack of belief". Even theists can have their theistic beliefs changed. That's why conversion exists. So under your retarded definition theists cannot actually hold beliefs at all too