Search Results
6/23/2025, 10:47:09 PM
>>508499320
I should really just write a pasta at the amount of times I've had to answer this. The common argument for immigration is, on the surface level, compassion, with the lie sold to the normie being that it's required to maintain present standards of living, or doing jobs Europeans won't do, or le skilled foreign labourers, or to make GDP line go up through the fiat/debt-based financial system that we've been forced onto.
This is a good argument that midwits will buy, but it's fairly easy to punch holes in when you really drill down into it, given questions like the OP's. The simple fact is the most obvious answer of all, because it is supported by the rhetoric, by the reaction of authorities when these campaigns are threatened, by what liberal "think-tanks" postulate, by documentation, intent, and most importantly: result.
You wouldn't replace objectively productive citizen with pieces of shit if you were trying to improve productivity. You wouldn't replace docile, dependable markets with violent hordes if you were trying to get rich and maintain financial stability. You wouldn't push for unchecked population growth if you constantly preached for climate sensitivity and sustainability.
The answer is in plain sight, and if it must be repeated a thousand times before you understand it, then so be it. Everything to do with politics in the modern world, be it media, policy, rhetoric, market behaviour, or psyops will only start to make sense when you view the modern Western world as being engineered from top to bottom, at the behest of International Jewry, with express intent to annihilate European genetics and culture. Until you embrace and understand this, you will be increasingly frustrated at trying to make sense of what is on its surface a seemingly crazy world. Everything falls into place when this is understood, and until this is understood, you can neither predict outcomes nor make plans to halt this process.
I should really just write a pasta at the amount of times I've had to answer this. The common argument for immigration is, on the surface level, compassion, with the lie sold to the normie being that it's required to maintain present standards of living, or doing jobs Europeans won't do, or le skilled foreign labourers, or to make GDP line go up through the fiat/debt-based financial system that we've been forced onto.
This is a good argument that midwits will buy, but it's fairly easy to punch holes in when you really drill down into it, given questions like the OP's. The simple fact is the most obvious answer of all, because it is supported by the rhetoric, by the reaction of authorities when these campaigns are threatened, by what liberal "think-tanks" postulate, by documentation, intent, and most importantly: result.
You wouldn't replace objectively productive citizen with pieces of shit if you were trying to improve productivity. You wouldn't replace docile, dependable markets with violent hordes if you were trying to get rich and maintain financial stability. You wouldn't push for unchecked population growth if you constantly preached for climate sensitivity and sustainability.
The answer is in plain sight, and if it must be repeated a thousand times before you understand it, then so be it. Everything to do with politics in the modern world, be it media, policy, rhetoric, market behaviour, or psyops will only start to make sense when you view the modern Western world as being engineered from top to bottom, at the behest of International Jewry, with express intent to annihilate European genetics and culture. Until you embrace and understand this, you will be increasingly frustrated at trying to make sense of what is on its surface a seemingly crazy world. Everything falls into place when this is understood, and until this is understood, you can neither predict outcomes nor make plans to halt this process.
Page 1