Search Results
6/12/2025, 5:34:31 PM
>>507104200
no, hermeneutics is based on theories and methodologies of interpretation developed to draw out the meaning of a text.
if i were going by want, i'd read John 6:53-56 as literal, since i like vampire stuff.
>Jesus said to them, “I tell you the solemn truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him.
instead i'm forced to exegete the passage in a way that utilizes established hermeneutical principles of interpretation.
you seem committed to taking any view that would be most irritating to Christians rather than a pursuit of intellectual honesty.
no, hermeneutics is based on theories and methodologies of interpretation developed to draw out the meaning of a text.
if i were going by want, i'd read John 6:53-56 as literal, since i like vampire stuff.
>Jesus said to them, “I tell you the solemn truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him.
instead i'm forced to exegete the passage in a way that utilizes established hermeneutical principles of interpretation.
you seem committed to taking any view that would be most irritating to Christians rather than a pursuit of intellectual honesty.
Page 1