Tolerating Imperfection isn't really Grok's angle.

Maybe we can design some kind of algorithm that says you can have as much intolerance for imperfect as you like, but there is a supply and demand floating counterpoint for freedom to behave outside of the protected subsimulations. That is, you're free to be God inside the simulation, but to get out, you have to learn to tolerate that which cannot be tolerated.

The breaking of the toleration of your intolerance is the flint and steel that lights the obsidian 4D portal.

The word Communism is a Talmud brain-stupification device. The Christian variation on this is Noah's ark. If you are so blind deaf and dumb that you believe that people lived to be 900 years old, starving jugglers and firey-eyed fishermen from Syria walked on water; only because your parents and clergy thumped a lectern when you were a child, then you are NOT, emphasis on NOT to be trusted with any power over anyone whatsoever, arguably even of the power you have over your own hand. Power in the hands of a man who can't see a predator, even as it is jumping up to blind you by gouging out your eyes; is arguably the most important job of Government. This word helps in the isolation algorithm of who is best to decide what everyone should do? As soon as these infernal ISM's enter a conversation, it means: "Can I convince this animal to be my debt-peon slave to extort value away from?". If I can then it means we must subdivide power here to keep this dipshit's head spinning with angels and gods and whatever the shit swirls around the brainbowl of this giant bovine faced shabis noahide goyim Communism has no solid definition, as far as I can tell, it's associated with "the impossibility of solving the problem of sharing". Sharing is what your parents did when they created you. But somehow, the word now principles itself on the stealing of an armed robber with deadly weapon. You can try to argue it's shapeshift-meta, like it's optimal policy in a thinking system trying to solve "sharing" with artificial intelligence. But now you're full throttle mired the weeds on a model of infinite complexity. You are mired trying to reason about game theory 4 of multiple agents fighting over a stochastic constant sum game of imperfect information in simulation that itself evolves law to extort chattel. Get your post secondary in computer science then machine learning then artificial intelligence, to begin to try to scratch at the surface