>>512024407
QED

Can you not even mount a basic response to the bot?
The points being made are pretty basic and what the alleged LLM did is just string it together in a series of words from context it had mimicked based on the training data it was given.
I don't think you need AI to do that but given how dumb pro-kremlin faggots keep spamming and posting worthlessly and perpetually off-topic or disingenuously with constant attempts to side-step the actual topic of discussion:
It would make sense to use bots and scripts and LLMs to counter the gish-gallop.
Hell, I had taken to writing down a few of the points I make as copypastas a long time ago.
Given how repetitive zigger talking points are and how algorithmically kremlin supporters behave and how trend-driven what they post about is.
They never admit they are wrong either, they just come back and repeat the same fallacious and wrong assertions.
I am sure that LLMs will cause a veritable eschatology of interpersonal epistemology online because one cannot know if one is speaking to an LLM or not.
What will separate the NPCs like ziggers from actual free human beings that remain such will be the intent and ability to discern motivations and inform themselves and peruse what they see online in a way that is more robust and disciplined than internet-driven dialog and knowledge acquisition has been until now.
Me writing this for the ziggers by hand is already more than they deserve.
Any ideas I share here won't reach ziggers.
They argue in bad faith and their support for the kremlin "the truth", anything else is just an afterthought.
Contextual or factual truths are utterly ignore and trampled.
That is why they deserve no human beings talking to them.
They're the comments section equivalent of a barking dog, a streaker in a stadium.
No value in their input beyond disruption.
A pathetic and deluded worldview that can't even stand up to alleged AIslop.