SCOTUS yet-to-be decided as of June 15, 2025:
US v Skrmetti: Whether 14A prohibits restrictions on child sexual mutilation
Hewitt v US: First Step Act applicability to an edge case
Stanley v Sanford FL: Applicability of disability
FSC v Paxton: Whether Texas can ban censorship
McLaughlin v McKesson: Relationship between judicial procedure and other laws
FDA v Reynolds Vapor: Judicial venue
Gutierrez v Saenz: Whether the Constitution requires DNA evidence for capital cases
Esteras v US: Immigration law
Perttu v Richards: PLRA right to jury trial
NRC v TX: Dispute about nuclear waste
LA v Callais: Potential error of district court
Riley v Bondi: Immigration deadlines
EPA v Calumet Shreveport: EPA venue
OK v EPA: EPA venue
Fuld v PLO: Due process clause and FSIA exemption for foreign terrorism
Medina v PP: Whether Planned Parenthood has a right to federal money under federal entitlement law
Kennedy v Braidwood: Potential 5C error
Mahmoud v Taylor: Woke education mandates
Diamond Alt Energy v EPA: Effects of regs on third parties

>>507637342
It's hard to tell. At this rate, it looks like it's less likely Canada will be admitted as a state and more likely it will be admitted as a territory, which increases likelihood of division on one hand and means less favorable treatment on the other. Homestead legislation will probably happen either way to settle northern regions of Canada. (In other words, there's going to be a program for free housing and large-scale construction which will drop Canadian housing prices dramatically.) It's possible Canada will be divided completely differently than it's currently divided as its population will be more northern after US annexation than it is currently, with less focus on east-west borders and more even borders that aren't virtually axial.