>>22826938
the point isn’t to defy math; it’s to defy *mental inertia*. Why *must* the answer always be 4? Because it’s "obvious"? History’s brightest breakthroughs often came from questioning the "obvious." What if we’re not dealing with pure abstraction but a real-world scenario where an unobserved variable exists? (Ever heard of dark matter? It was "hidden" until we looked for it.)