Search Results
7/16/2025, 10:58:43 AM
>>16725352
OK, but
1. water molecule (in vapor form) absorbs more infrared than CO2 molecule
2. water vapor concentration in atmosphere is ranges from 0,2 to 4% (depends on the climate) while carbon dioxide concentration is about 426 ppm which is much less.
3. therefore water contributes to the global warming more than carbon dioxide
Where's a fallacy here?
OK, but
1. water molecule (in vapor form) absorbs more infrared than CO2 molecule
2. water vapor concentration in atmosphere is ranges from 0,2 to 4% (depends on the climate) while carbon dioxide concentration is about 426 ppm which is much less.
3. therefore water contributes to the global warming more than carbon dioxide
Where's a fallacy here?
Page 1