>>7614766
>They sample from Loomis and attribute their findings to Loomis, but they don't directly use Loomis 1:1.
Yes. That's how you should use all drawing books. That's hardly some niche thing they only do in Japan.

>>7614769
>beg trap
If you don't want to draw a in a single uniform width, or you're having trouble with it, it's good to have some idea of what you're doing with line widths and why.

>>7614774
It's the same general advice you find with all line width tutorials (picrel for example), what's so wrong with it? That it's animated?
I just thought it was more in line with what OP had wanted.