>>530421435
>>530429454
>how the dual-natured creative-destructive feminine ideal of various ancient and some modern non abrahamic societies it not both better for women and better for children beyond "well, its really hard for them to be [classically] virtuous ok?"
and
>how any self-respecting male could subject mauvika, being emblematic of the above, to derision
In turn, I will, in good faith, critically engage with your arguments by countering with the observation that the Celtic, Germanic, and Romantic (Lating, Iberian, etc...) paganism all featured dual-natured goddesses in their respective pantheons; 11th century being the birthday of "modern" "western" civilization is totally retarded insofar as the primary intellectual and cultural developments of various nations of the medieval Christian world either occurred in the Early Medieval Period or in the Renaissance; how the religious officials had a veritable monopoly on intellectual development of the Medieval Christian world and how scholasticism intellectual tradition can be traced back through the Gnostic church father and by extension the Neoplatonism all the way back into Hellenic world of classical antiquity; etc....
Finally, on the subject of desiderata, I should say [1] I was mobile-posting between sets at the gym OHPing your squat and [2] your PhD in philosophy does confer incontro authority on matters of history or, tragically in this case, logic

If this thread goes on much longer..

Mavuika is my favorite character