>>712493401
>Games are toys, yeah. I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with you about this lol
If you actually thought that you wouldn’t have engaged the point in the first place. You’re just incapable of saying why and showing that you’re seething about people that like and play games.
>To be more specific, I am calling you worthless manchildren
Yes I’m aware you’re doing that. Which is another logical fallacy called ad hominem.
>So, what, you're suggesting that the game is bullying and gaslighting other people and you're here out of the goodness of your heart to defend those poor gaslighted and bullied people
More like I don’t like shitty behavior being championed and agenda pushing in my games.
>It's not a strawman. Let me remind you, you wrote this sentence
And that’s not what you quoted in the beginning which was pointed out here >>712492969 you only quoted this after and I said that I did in fact say it but didn’t say the other thing you said that I said.
>You wrote this sentence about a Norwegian indie video game
When did I say anything about things conspiring against me or attacking me? Show my exact post?
>No, that's a comparison and a good one
It’s a strawman given you said that I said something that I didn’t and you calling it a comparison post hoc just gives credence to that fact.
>Yeah, you really are autistic. What even is this sentence
Can you not read? You were pretending that the thing I admitted you saying was the strawman I was talking about when it wasn’t and I pointed that out.
>Anyway, refer to what I said in response to
Again when did I say it was conspiring against me? You can’t show me saying that. But good job showing yet again how you’re just making up strawmen.