>>105822901
It's the other way around. x86 can only be feasibly made by Intel and AMD due to patent bullshit. Technically the x86 patents already expired, but they add minor new features every now and then to get a new patent and everything starts using/requiring those new features rendering potential competitors non-viable whenever the previous patent expires (because the new features still have active patents). That's why everybody wants to ditch x86 even though the alternatives are worse.

>>105824772
That's just ARM. Sadly it's only desktop/laptop x86 competitor with any real traction.