>>511194935
He was guilty. We know a posteriori that he was guilty and hiding something, so we shouldn’t give him the benefit of the doubt as if it’s up in the air whether he was just protecting himself from the big mean feds. You’re acting like Epstein’s personal lawyer here to avoid acknowledging that implication.

We literally KNOW he fucked those kids for a fact, and you keep playing this game of “well maybe he was just acting wise in front of the mean fed boys, who KNOWS what the truth could possibly be? It’s his right not to tell us, so we will never know uwu”

>>511114893
It wouldn’t matter because without signings regulatory and/or legislative reform they’d come RIGHT back. That’s how economic incentives work.

>>510116725
>wordswordswords