>>510860397
>People are asking why he is protecting pedophiles.
you've literally already failed because of this exact phrasing

this is where rhetoric goes to die. you lack the ability to prove trump did anything illicit, so you skip the entire argument and leap to the shock-value emotional judgement (why do you protect/support [crime] etc). the hollowness of this non-argument is its own concession. it's basically the last stage of a crocodile tear leftist seethe cycle that completely lacks any effective rhetorical weight. in short, we seen it before (and by "we" i mean the hairy-armed 200lb+ red state red tshirt maga mainstream on txitter, which is the target audience you wish you could reach)

i'm just giving you some information here, what you choose to do with it is up to you lol. but guess what? your voters are being deported and after 10 years of shilling on /pol/ support and confidence in Trump is higher than ever. this would be useful information if you wanted to approach your problem scientifically.