Search Results
7/14/2025, 6:16:03 PM
>>510295566
UKRAINE CAN STILL WIN
>Western Half Measures Have Prolonged the War, but Decisive Action Now Could End It
>in late May, Kuleba said neither Russia nor Ukraine “has much of an incentive to stop the fighting.” Ukraine refuses to surrender its sovereignty; Russia will not accept anything less than Ukrainian capitulation. This conclusion, however, does not mean all is lost. Russia is much weaker economically than many analysts realize, and hard-hitting sanctions and export controls can still cripple its war economy.
>Ukraine is fighting smartly and could turn the tide on the battlefield. With a change of strategy, Ukraine can still win the war in the near term—if both Europe and the United States decide to give it the assistance it needs.
>Despite significant constraints on the aid that Europe and the United States have offered over the past three and a half years, Ukraine has achieved impressive victories.
lol "constraints on aid"
>Indeed, what most consistently hindered Ukraine’s war effort was not Kyiv’s lack of manpower or weak resolve compared with Putin, but rather an insufficient supply of advanced military capabilities.
just ignore Abrams, Leopards, F-16s, ATACMs, HIMARS, M109s, M777s, Archers, Storm Shadows, SCALPs etc etc anon.
>The linchpin for this new strategy is the West’s mobilization of the approximately $300 billion in frozen Russian assets held in their jurisdictions. Some EU leaders have argued that these assets should be saved for reconstruction efforts after the war ends. Others worry about setting a dangerous precedent for the rule of law by seizing a country’s funds. If Europe is to help bring this war to an end, it must set these concerns aside and act now.
What could possibly go wrong?
>Indeed, from a strategic vantage point, Russia has already lost this war. Regardless of how much additional territory changes hands, the Ukrainian nation is lost to Russia forever.
Cope: the post
Tasty seethe at https://archive.md/uT7uQ
UKRAINE CAN STILL WIN
>Western Half Measures Have Prolonged the War, but Decisive Action Now Could End It
>in late May, Kuleba said neither Russia nor Ukraine “has much of an incentive to stop the fighting.” Ukraine refuses to surrender its sovereignty; Russia will not accept anything less than Ukrainian capitulation. This conclusion, however, does not mean all is lost. Russia is much weaker economically than many analysts realize, and hard-hitting sanctions and export controls can still cripple its war economy.
>Ukraine is fighting smartly and could turn the tide on the battlefield. With a change of strategy, Ukraine can still win the war in the near term—if both Europe and the United States decide to give it the assistance it needs.
>Despite significant constraints on the aid that Europe and the United States have offered over the past three and a half years, Ukraine has achieved impressive victories.
lol "constraints on aid"
>Indeed, what most consistently hindered Ukraine’s war effort was not Kyiv’s lack of manpower or weak resolve compared with Putin, but rather an insufficient supply of advanced military capabilities.
just ignore Abrams, Leopards, F-16s, ATACMs, HIMARS, M109s, M777s, Archers, Storm Shadows, SCALPs etc etc anon.
>The linchpin for this new strategy is the West’s mobilization of the approximately $300 billion in frozen Russian assets held in their jurisdictions. Some EU leaders have argued that these assets should be saved for reconstruction efforts after the war ends. Others worry about setting a dangerous precedent for the rule of law by seizing a country’s funds. If Europe is to help bring this war to an end, it must set these concerns aside and act now.
What could possibly go wrong?
>Indeed, from a strategic vantage point, Russia has already lost this war. Regardless of how much additional territory changes hands, the Ukrainian nation is lost to Russia forever.
Cope: the post
Tasty seethe at https://archive.md/uT7uQ
Page 1