Search Results
7/10/2025, 4:16:07 AM
7/7/2025, 9:12:25 PM
7/5/2025, 6:04:33 PM
>>126933009
>requiring higher intelligence to appreciate than classical music
An arbitrary claim
>popslop
>meaning you were the first one to categorize it
Categorizing would be calling it "popular music" not dismissive term. He suggested I didn't know what qualifies as pop music, to which I responded with the definition.
>You do understand that this meme
>meme
No. Johann Forkel (founder of classical music historiography) defined the canon in 19th century. Later came Burney Hawkins who established who further elaborated on the canon. And around mid 19th century there was a clear classification and distinction between art music and pop/folk music. This "meme" is not some imageboard nonsense but a century old musicological classification.
>doesn't actually dictate anything objective
It literally does, that's the entire point of it. Of course, your post-modernist kind will disagree and claim everything is subjective to which I'll just comapre you to sophists.
>It's not an authority here.
What is that even supposed to mean
>You're allowed to disagree with it or disregard it.
Yeah just as you're allowed to say earth is flat.
>Music can be categorized in other ways
Which are irrelevant to this discussion.
>Generative music as a concept doesn't really fit neatly into either of the categories proposed in that theory
It does. Read the definition of popular music.
>>126933010
>A chord is two or more different notes played simultaneously
Incorrect. A chord has three notes. And not all three notes are called "chords" in traditional, 18th century sense.
>A power chord is the simplest type of chord,
It's not a chord, as I already explained. Learn to read.
>A unison or an octave is not a chord because it uses only one note.
It has two notes, of the same pitch class. It is an interval just like a fifth.
>>126933029
"It proves you wrong on both accounts, actually."
>requiring higher intelligence to appreciate than classical music
An arbitrary claim
>popslop
>meaning you were the first one to categorize it
Categorizing would be calling it "popular music" not dismissive term. He suggested I didn't know what qualifies as pop music, to which I responded with the definition.
>You do understand that this meme
>meme
No. Johann Forkel (founder of classical music historiography) defined the canon in 19th century. Later came Burney Hawkins who established who further elaborated on the canon. And around mid 19th century there was a clear classification and distinction between art music and pop/folk music. This "meme" is not some imageboard nonsense but a century old musicological classification.
>doesn't actually dictate anything objective
It literally does, that's the entire point of it. Of course, your post-modernist kind will disagree and claim everything is subjective to which I'll just comapre you to sophists.
>It's not an authority here.
What is that even supposed to mean
>You're allowed to disagree with it or disregard it.
Yeah just as you're allowed to say earth is flat.
>Music can be categorized in other ways
Which are irrelevant to this discussion.
>Generative music as a concept doesn't really fit neatly into either of the categories proposed in that theory
It does. Read the definition of popular music.
>>126933010
>A chord is two or more different notes played simultaneously
Incorrect. A chord has three notes. And not all three notes are called "chords" in traditional, 18th century sense.
>A power chord is the simplest type of chord,
It's not a chord, as I already explained. Learn to read.
>A unison or an octave is not a chord because it uses only one note.
It has two notes, of the same pitch class. It is an interval just like a fifth.
>>126933029
"It proves you wrong on both accounts, actually."
6/16/2025, 5:50:53 PM
Page 1