Here's the thing. You said a "pajeet is a white." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a scientist who studies whites, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls pajeets whites. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "white family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of indo-europeans, which includes things from persians to romanians to afghans. So your reasoning for calling a pajeet a white is because random government agencies "call the caucasian ones whites?" Let's get semites and somalians in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A pajeet is a pajeet and a member of the white family. But that's not what you said. You said a pajeet is a white, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the white family whites, which means you'd call pakis and other south asians whites too. Which you said you don't. It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?