>>4401686
>That would explain
There's a difference between a healthy sheen and greasy hair. Her hair being "oily" down the length is a clear sign of actual care. It wouldn't be "oily" down the length without such. It wouldn't look that good and flow that well and sweep to the sides of the back otherwise. It wouldn't cascade to form uniform tresses of ends otherwise. There would be no bounce, it would fall poorly instead of perfectly framing her cute face. That sheen is what women in the far past spent dozens of hours of manpower and the collection of bespoke concoctions to cultivate. Putting to practice the hundred strokes with conditioning oils to cycle out old buildup. Good hair was a literal class separator back then. Her hair is nowhere even close to the oiled dullness of an actual bare minimum. In which her roots would be bad and her ends would be dry. Washing hair "regularly" (every day or two days) is something that only exists BECAUSE of shampoo and conditioner, primarily conditioner. Furthermore the very mention of soap in this leads me to believe you think that she uses soap on her hair and also leads me to believe that you put it in your own. I beg you to never speak on the behalf of hair until you learn something. If you do so.