>>105795654
>>105795696
they dont need speed, technology or an even playing field. they need 1. numbers, 2. organization (both of which they would have in that scenario) and 3, for humans to keep being human, which we would, even with +100 iq. do you think the "smartest" humans arent complete fuckups? i'm not saying it would be easy, i'm saying we'd help them do it. hell some people even now think people they disagree with should be eliminated just because. that wouldnt change, with +100,+500 or even +1000 iq.