Search Results
6/27/2025, 11:24:34 PM
>>508880005
yeah nuclear waste is bad, but its a lot smaller then coal waste. about 130 million tons of waste. per year. compared to the 2000 tons of waste nuclear energy produces. per year.
now, nuclear waste is really bad, and we really gotta take care of it. but it produces about....0.00153846154% of the waste that coal does? thats....3 decimal points past 1%. its fucking microscopic compared to coal waste, like holy fucking shit its SO MUCH LESS, SO MUCH SMALLER HOLY FUCKING SHIT WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING COAL, HOLY FUCK.
anyways, id like to suggest a reduction of pollution in the enviroment and the world, by recommended we switch to the extremely hazardous, wasteful, production of energy using coal, which would reduce pollution by a minor, tiny, percent. roughly 99.9984615385%
just a little
yeah nuclear waste is bad, but its a lot smaller then coal waste. about 130 million tons of waste. per year. compared to the 2000 tons of waste nuclear energy produces. per year.
now, nuclear waste is really bad, and we really gotta take care of it. but it produces about....0.00153846154% of the waste that coal does? thats....3 decimal points past 1%. its fucking microscopic compared to coal waste, like holy fucking shit its SO MUCH LESS, SO MUCH SMALLER HOLY FUCKING SHIT WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING COAL, HOLY FUCK.
anyways, id like to suggest a reduction of pollution in the enviroment and the world, by recommended we switch to the extremely hazardous, wasteful, production of energy using coal, which would reduce pollution by a minor, tiny, percent. roughly 99.9984615385%
just a little
6/13/2025, 8:42:56 AM
dudes obviously taken some filters to some columbine shooting pictures and tried to make it grim dark. just blur your eyes a bit
Page 1