Completely different. Nothing to see here.
https://xcancel.com/nathansldennis/status/1940780595107582085#m

Apparently, a factor you have no control over makes all the difference. Widespread dissemination is such a stupid metric to judge these cases by. Firstly, sending a message to five people who you know are liable to act on it is far worse than sending it to millions. Secondly, most of the responses to Lucy were people critical of her. It was mainly leftists spreading the Tweet. Thirdly, those were not the typical views one of her posts received. It wasn't foreseeable. Also, the more others spread it, the more the Tweet appears in different feeds. A person scrolling past a Tweet still counts as a view. Lastly, I have cases where a judge counted a post sent to a small private group as constituting widespread dissemination because “it could have been shared”. A fact that was upheld on appeal.