Search Results
ID: Td9mY6sf/pol/507688182#507691876
6/17/2025, 7:41:20 AM
>>507349656
Another Israeli Act of War-Crime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble
Another Israeli Act of War-Crime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble
ID: bNKjwET6/pol/507610262#507617686
6/16/2025, 8:24:51 PM
>>507616444
>You look like you love cock.
are you trying to dox?
like? are you trying to inti idate that guy? I heard that he doxxed himself for over a year and invited anons to deink beer with him, he use to drink tequila all night and twitter rant at taylor swift on her official @taymorawift13 account... she wrote the you need to calm down song about it .. heard he use to produce hip-hop and write poetry..
are you trying to doxx him?
do you think youre intimidating him?
so.thing about the midnights album and billiie eilish lyrics wearing a cardigan sweater with a big G on it
whats your point ?
>You look like you love cock.
are you trying to dox?
like? are you trying to inti idate that guy? I heard that he doxxed himself for over a year and invited anons to deink beer with him, he use to drink tequila all night and twitter rant at taylor swift on her official @taymorawift13 account... she wrote the you need to calm down song about it .. heard he use to produce hip-hop and write poetry..
are you trying to doxx him?
do you think youre intimidating him?
so.thing about the midnights album and billiie eilish lyrics wearing a cardigan sweater with a big G on it
whats your point ?
ID: br2Rl6nE/pol/507290127#507294774
6/14/2025, 4:00:17 AM
>>507294403
>False. Warcrimes require a trial and conviction. These cannot occur whilst the territorial occupation is in progress. Until peace is sued for can a war crime be prosecuted.
>
>This is assuming of course that international law exists.
your argument is lame... go argue with grok nigger!
>False. Warcrimes require a trial and conviction. These cannot occur whilst the territorial occupation is in progress. Until peace is sued for can a war crime be prosecuted.
>
>This is assuming of course that international law exists.
your argument is lame... go argue with grok nigger!
Page 1