>>507388973
>>507389127
And look how retarded you are. Yes you vote for the lesser of two evils. That's why rightists also vote the lesser of two evils, which happens to be the one not stoking mass migration and extreme anti-white anti-male rhetoric.

Both sides engage in some level of pragmatism. You choose some billionaires that offer to protect blacks, spics, trannies and women, while others choose the ones to protect white males, women, children.
>>507389505
If the state were a uniparty, there would be no lesser of two evils. You really believe that the uniparty would let your democrat vote help the proletariat? As I said, they offer you protection for your retarded lumpenprolen groups, while republicans offer protection to the majority of proles (whites). It's just how it is.
>>507389752
>Left-wing politics describes the range of political ideologies that support and seek to achieve social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy either as a whole[1][2][4] or of certain social hierarchies.[5] Left-wing politics typically involve a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished,[3] through radical means that change the nature of the society they are implemented in
hmm
>Identity politics is politics based on a particular identity, such as ethnicity, race, nationality, religion, denomination, gender, sexual orientation, social background, political affiliation, caste, age, education, disability, opinion, intelligence, and social class. The term encompasses various often-populist political phenomena and rhetoric, such as governmental migration policies that regulate mobility and opportunity based on identities, left-wing agendas involving intersectional politics
>... describing hyper-specific groups. An example is that of African-American homosexual women, who can constitute a...
You are ignorant.