>>510848943
A few years ago I read some effortpost here trying to explain the inexplicable dissonance of women hating rapists and men, and yet near-unanimously campaigning for more rapist men to invade our societies through immigration, and it said that they're doing it to lower their own tribe's sexual market value so that there is more competition among the native males against the immigrant ones and so that unfuckable feminist landwhales can finally reproduce. Basically, their genes are doing an abstract self-preservation where they realize that they're never competing with the unreasonable standards of modernity so the only means of replicating themselves is to lower the standards by increasing the demand for pussy.

You can apply this lens to most of the dissonating things that feminists support to get an instant logical explanation for the supposed dissonance. Why are they against sexualized women in video games and yet support "sex workers"? Because the perfect ideal of a woman being fed into your brain through the video game also increases the standards and lowers their sexual market value, so filling up your games with crippled and obese niggers makes you blind to the high standards and makes their ugly pussy valuable again, without interfering one bit with their fellow intersectional prostitutes at the OF side - it's the perfect win-win condition for them and all women are pleased. Similarly the support for trannies throughout the 2010s and then sudden 180 once the surgery improved, is because the older crossdressing variety never passed and added to the value of a woman who actually passed biologically, and as soon as some of them became too feminine and the zoomers started fucking them en masse, you got a blowup of TERF support - trannies were now hurting femininity on a genetic level and had to go. Same with opposition to sex bots while using dildos. It's all genetic in nature, they're abusing the state to add scarcity and value to their garbage genes.