>>279673976
>I'm sure they got away...
Huh? I'm talking about the Rabbit Gang..
>Pan didn't care, Pan was negligent. Pan could be charged by the law.
That would be impossibe..
>Did she really learn anything?
She knew enough that it was bad, but it's definitely not enough to make her feel even worse about it..
>It cannot be up for debate, Pan committed a crime and purposely covered it up, knowing that the ship was going to take off very soon, she placed everyone's lives in danger, not only the ship's crew but also everyone else.
Pan may have cause the initial damage, but Bulma and her team still bear the responsibility of safety..
>Now?
Next post.
>And all the material in those magazines, where did it come from?
They came from the anime staff..
>GT decided to continue Z's resolution, Vegeta's character arc was over, also, their initial intention wasn't to focus on older characters, they wanted to explore the newer generation, they basically forced to bring Vegeta back. Proof? Notice how they changed his look throughout GT.
I agree with that, but how does Vegeta's appearence indicate his pending involvement?
>Two years max, maybe less.
It that really a long time? I mean, remember how quicky they were able to churn out episode in the 1980s and 90s?
>I don't think anyone wants another Daima, it steered too far way from what DB should be.
It did, but I still want a conclusion on Kibito and Shin's fusion, not to mention those fusion bugs..
>Pan tricked him into doing that...
Proof? Pan is not the sort to try and trick others..
>Violence can be many things, the problem with Super was that it was very poorly executed, I maintain my question about their personalities, how do you explain what they became?
If we are specifically talking about Vegeta and Goku, then it's obvious that they were written in such a way to accomodate eachother..
>Like the one of a monkey, that's canon.
Yes, but how can Goku have black and brown hair?

Continued..