>>40763626
what i'm really curious about is
>how come the freemasons and sects adjacents to them have never even made one passing reference to the alawites if the latter are supposed to hold one of the keys to the ultimate truth? seems like a pretty dumb thing to do if you're conquering the world
>if they have, and i'd like to see proof of that, could it be that the neverending conflict around the gulf and the greater middle eastern area be a concentrated effort to suppress and archive any traces of said precious knowledge, especially with all the happenings in babylonian and sumerian sites brought forth by the ISIS attacks (palmyra incident) and the suppose stories of US Marines being tasked to seize artifacts during the second gulf war?
In the meantime, I think i'll stick with my nigga Ibn Arabi.