>>105640975
>>105640873
nta, the way I see it, hdr makes sense, just, and just just, use hdr footage, which is nothing else that 32 bits footage or whatever that has overbrights and darks
my take? I won't buy an hdr monitor until hdr footage is everywhere because is futre-proofing and that, potentially can't end well

in fact I want to buy a second monitor, for programming and torrented movies in 4k, and every new bit of info I aquire on the new display technologies makes me want to buy it less and less, as I stand now, everything has massive faults that kinda make me want just an lcd, and I'm not even sure if they sell those anymore, 4k howevr I'm convinced of, but imo, yeah, dinamic range (not talking about hdr) is more important, anyways, fuck current monitors