Search Results
8/4/2025, 9:53:03 PM
>>938015167
The mechanism is xenogenetics, gene therapies, etc. It's possible to make the euphemistic 'catgirl' today using gene therapies alone; you can use localized techniques to change skin color, add fur and cosmetic earlike structures. However these are untested in the germline so you'd need to repeat the therapy as cells die.
Hence why I said it's ethically nonviable. Even if people consented to this kind of procedure it's a new precedent that people don't want to broach for obvious reasons. Look up the Asilomar Conference for precedent on that. We've already seen what happens to people who challenge this boundary like He Jiankui. Bioethics is not willing to entertain manipulation of sex genes, so social movements have decided the topic will be sex roles themselves to eventually soften the blow of inevitable transhumanist technologies.
The mechanism is xenogenetics, gene therapies, etc. It's possible to make the euphemistic 'catgirl' today using gene therapies alone; you can use localized techniques to change skin color, add fur and cosmetic earlike structures. However these are untested in the germline so you'd need to repeat the therapy as cells die.
Hence why I said it's ethically nonviable. Even if people consented to this kind of procedure it's a new precedent that people don't want to broach for obvious reasons. Look up the Asilomar Conference for precedent on that. We've already seen what happens to people who challenge this boundary like He Jiankui. Bioethics is not willing to entertain manipulation of sex genes, so social movements have decided the topic will be sex roles themselves to eventually soften the blow of inevitable transhumanist technologies.
Page 1