Search Results
7/26/2025, 3:37:52 AM
7/25/2025, 12:38:19 AM
7/18/2025, 4:22:36 PM
7/14/2025, 7:34:59 PM
7/14/2025, 3:09:50 PM
>>18251362
wwe does something really cool in the eyes of Dave , Dave’s brain doesn’t like that!
> quick! Say it’s the best thing “on U.S soil”
> whew! That was close! I almost admitted i like wwe
wwe does something really cool in the eyes of Dave , Dave’s brain doesn’t like that!
> quick! Say it’s the best thing “on U.S soil”
> whew! That was close! I almost admitted i like wwe
7/14/2025, 4:59:28 AM
7/13/2025, 7:13:20 PM
>>18238262
Dave and Bryan said it was from a clothesline in his last match with Fletcher
Dave and Bryan said it was from a clothesline in his last match with Fletcher
7/5/2025, 3:25:41 AM
7/3/2025, 4:53:52 PM
> i think the max viewership is 350,000 a week
> dynamite beat raw in the ratings last week in total viewership WHICH NO ONE HAD ON THEIR BINGO CARDS!
> real mathematicians have sent me their work and they believe the real number is is higher than 350 K
Bryan then challenges Dave and says “how is the one show selling out venues weekly losing to the other show is struggling to sell 3500 ticket a week. Dave then says it’s just like when GLOW was beating raw weekly in the ratings back in the day. I can’t make this up . By the way, he has no concrete proof of what either platform is doing outside of his own head canon, and apparently these mathematicians that are sending him weekly rating reports. Usually Brian stays quiet, but he couldn’t let this one go.
Audio starts at 20:00
https://youtu.be/EXHwvzEvPYc?si=cxkghYwpemSIZXnr
> dynamite beat raw in the ratings last week in total viewership WHICH NO ONE HAD ON THEIR BINGO CARDS!
> real mathematicians have sent me their work and they believe the real number is is higher than 350 K
Bryan then challenges Dave and says “how is the one show selling out venues weekly losing to the other show is struggling to sell 3500 ticket a week. Dave then says it’s just like when GLOW was beating raw weekly in the ratings back in the day. I can’t make this up . By the way, he has no concrete proof of what either platform is doing outside of his own head canon, and apparently these mathematicians that are sending him weekly rating reports. Usually Brian stays quiet, but he couldn’t let this one go.
Audio starts at 20:00
https://youtu.be/EXHwvzEvPYc?si=cxkghYwpemSIZXnr
6/14/2025, 5:30:53 AM
>>17994878
>There's a lot of talk that Rhea Ripley is the biggest women's star. The amount of Rhea Ripley stalkers is 7% of the fanbase, however when you contrast that with the overall viewership on instagram and tiktok of posts featuring her it's actually only 1.6% of overall hits on those posts that are stalking Rhea Ripley. Now where it gets really crazy, if you look at the Google metrics, Rhea Ripley and Liv Morgan should have about 30-35% of the stalkers, but actually when you divide the followers by stalkers, Iyo Sky has 44% of the stalkers, and when you limit that to the 18-35 demo who still live with their parents that goes up even more to 49% so actually Stephanie Vaquer has the most stalkers
>There's a lot of talk that Rhea Ripley is the biggest women's star. The amount of Rhea Ripley stalkers is 7% of the fanbase, however when you contrast that with the overall viewership on instagram and tiktok of posts featuring her it's actually only 1.6% of overall hits on those posts that are stalking Rhea Ripley. Now where it gets really crazy, if you look at the Google metrics, Rhea Ripley and Liv Morgan should have about 30-35% of the stalkers, but actually when you divide the followers by stalkers, Iyo Sky has 44% of the stalkers, and when you limit that to the 18-35 demo who still live with their parents that goes up even more to 49% so actually Stephanie Vaquer has the most stalkers
Page 1