>>936651479
>Exactly. And it's really difficult to get any kind of accurate research on this, for obvious reasons.
no its not. and the fact that both professional studies and internet surveys have consistently arrived at the same percentages is very telling.
my claim that only 30% of true pedos like toddlers too is my weakest one because there has been very little studies that even care to make a distinction

>>936651616
yes. there is a pedo on your street. there is a pedo on your apartment floor. there is a pedo in your supermarket.

however, the discussion of what ages can and cannot consent is not a sexological one or an appeal to popularity, its an ethical one. do not conflate the too. i am not interested in discussing the ethics of fucking young people but I'll discuss the science and sexology of it all day because that's actually a little bit empirical and interesting to me instead of retarded normalfag opinions i dont care about or retarded pedofag opinions i could care equally less about