Search Results
6/27/2025, 8:13:46 PM
>>508890299
Bit Islamophobic that
Bit Islamophobic that
6/25/2025, 5:41:24 PM
>>508696674
While banned for impersonating Marianna Spring, I came across something related to that meme. The Home Affairs Select Committee actually included that image in one of their reports on “Hate and Abuse on Social Media”.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/609/60904.htm
I originally came across it because I was reading a report from the Law Commission on our racial hatred laws. They were whining because the Free Speech Union accused them of wanting to ban Muhammad cartoons:
>Free Speech Union, “The Law Commission would make Mohammed cartoons illegal”: The FSU claimed that it was “clear” that a reference to “Islamophobic cartoons …” [ellipsis in the FSU text, not the consultation paper] included the images of Muhammad published in Charlie Hebdo. The curtailed phrase was also used in an article in the Spectator by the Union’s Director Toby Young. The untruncated text referred to “Islamophobic cartoons cited by the Home Affairs Committee” [emphasis added] with a footnote citing the page of the Home Affairs Committee report in question. This, in turn, referred to “a cartoon of a white woman being gang raped by Muslims over the ‘altar of multiculturalism’; a cartoon stating that ‘Muslims rape’” and “a cartoon that we reported depicting a group of male, ethnic minority migrants tying up and abusing a semi-naked white woman, while stabbing her baby to death.” It did not refer to Charlie Hebdo or images of Muhammad in general; it explicitly referred to something else.
They then quote some countering extremism report:
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250109095721mp_/https://cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/30/2021/12/Hate-crime-report-accessible.pdf
They basically want to make our stirring up hatred laws worse, by extending written material to include visual memes such as that one.
While banned for impersonating Marianna Spring, I came across something related to that meme. The Home Affairs Select Committee actually included that image in one of their reports on “Hate and Abuse on Social Media”.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/609/60904.htm
I originally came across it because I was reading a report from the Law Commission on our racial hatred laws. They were whining because the Free Speech Union accused them of wanting to ban Muhammad cartoons:
>Free Speech Union, “The Law Commission would make Mohammed cartoons illegal”: The FSU claimed that it was “clear” that a reference to “Islamophobic cartoons …” [ellipsis in the FSU text, not the consultation paper] included the images of Muhammad published in Charlie Hebdo. The curtailed phrase was also used in an article in the Spectator by the Union’s Director Toby Young. The untruncated text referred to “Islamophobic cartoons cited by the Home Affairs Committee” [emphasis added] with a footnote citing the page of the Home Affairs Committee report in question. This, in turn, referred to “a cartoon of a white woman being gang raped by Muslims over the ‘altar of multiculturalism’; a cartoon stating that ‘Muslims rape’” and “a cartoon that we reported depicting a group of male, ethnic minority migrants tying up and abusing a semi-naked white woman, while stabbing her baby to death.” It did not refer to Charlie Hebdo or images of Muhammad in general; it explicitly referred to something else.
They then quote some countering extremism report:
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250109095721mp_/https://cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/30/2021/12/Hate-crime-report-accessible.pdf
They basically want to make our stirring up hatred laws worse, by extending written material to include visual memes such as that one.
Page 1