I've been travelling around SEA, Sweden, Armenia, Iran, Germany, France, Belgium, Australia and New Zealand, Ireland.
Wherever I have gone in the world.
I have been racist and anti Semitic online, attacked every single country and their abuses of human rights.

No one the people care.
But the Jews do, all of a sudden the media change and start talking about how Ireland is getting immigrants.
How Sweden is going to get more Somalians.
How Thailand women are whores and they are going to create conflict with Cambodia and Myanmar.
And on and on.

They are literally bombing women and children and committing genocide.
No other people on earth get this level of protection and systematic protection.

The US tax payers gives them over 5 billion every year, a so called first world nation that has free healthcare, while the Americans go bankrupt from getting sick from the healthcare services that keeps Americans poor and dependant.

Every place, every single place has got these people coming out of the woodwork trying to fuck over the flag that speaks out against their exploits and injustices. But other people, from Indians, Africans, British, Americans, Mexicans, Chinks... All of these people when they are politically attacked and their nations and people are insulted get on with it and give bants backs.

But for some reason, the Jews create wars, bring in immigrants and start trying to inflame racial tensions between other people.
There is no peace because of them, I've confirmed it.

Its the fucking Jews, its always been the fucking Jews.

>>508335914
>>508335914
COVID revealed this plainly—what we call politics is merely the surface performance of a system already captured. The media, bureaucracy, and corporate institutions do not operate in the interests of the people, but serve an empire whose goal is control, not liberation.

This global system traffics in human capital and crushes any organic culture, free speech, or elevated thought that threatens its machinery. The media, far from being a check on power, is a psychological weapon used to enforce a false reality. It ensures that every political question is reduced to two manufactured sides, both controlled.

This is why many dissidents—especially anonymous voices online—have long called for a “third position.” Not a middle ground, but a rejection of the entire frame.
Take COVID as an example: they said you either “believe in science” (support mandates and forced vaccination) or you’re an “anti-vaxxer” (a dangerous denialist). But the third position—the one never acknowledged—was simple: bodily autonomy, the right to consent, and the refusal of state intrusion. This basic principle was excluded because it exposes the illusion of choice. This pattern repeats across every debate: controlled opposition, false dichotomies, and no room for genuine dissent. That’s why the number 3 matters. It’s more than a symbol—it’s a cipher for those who reject the binary mind trap and see the hidden architecture behind the system. And once you see it, you’ll start to notice how much of reality is engineered to deny you that very awareness.

In the post-war era, Western nations like Britain, Canada, Germany, and Australia were pressured—primarily by the Jewish lobbying in the U.S.—to adopt expansive immigration and integration policies under the guise of human rights and global responsibility. What began as humanitarian policy has quietly eroded national identity. Cultural pride is now conflated with extremism, and dissent is met with censorship. Citizens face higher taxes, fewer freedoms, and declining trust in their governments—all while being told that limitless diversity is progress.

Yet this demand for openness is not applied equally. Nations such as Israel, Saudi Arabia, China, and Japan maintain strict immigration controls and preserve their cultural identities without global condemnation. No one lectures them about diversity or post-nationalism. Meanwhile, the West is expected to transform demographically, often against the will of its people.

This imbalance isn't about fairness—it leads to destabilization. When global institutions promote demographic change in one set of countries while excusing its rejection in others, people naturally suspect orchestration, not coincidence. The consequence is not unity, but fragmentation—where the founding populations feel alienated in the nations they built.

This isn’t a plea for hate, but for honesty. A nation cannot endure without a people who believe it belongs to them. And when that belief dies, so does the will to defend or reform. Increasingly, the response is not rebellion, but indifference. If the nation no longer serves its people, many conclude, neither does saving it.

For many, a consistent path forward would involve Israel demonstrating the same commitment to diversity it encourages in Western nations—by welcoming millions of skilled migrants, such as Black African doctors and engineers, as a gesture of solidarity and shared responsibility.