>>512023545
Can you mount a textbook response to it?
Besides - the points he's making are pretty basic.
I don't think you need AI to do that but given how dumb faggots like you keep spamming and posting worthlessly and perpetually off-topic with constant attempts to side-step the actual topic of discussion:
It would make sense to use bots and scripts.
Hell, I had taken to writing down a few of the points I make as copypastas a long time ago, given how repetitive zigger talking points are and how algorithmically kremlin supporters behave and how trend-driven what they post about is.
I am sure that LLMs will cause a veritable eschatology of interpersonal epistemology online because one cannot know if one is speaking to an LLM or not.
What will separate the NPCs like you from actual free human beings that remain such will be the intent and ability to discern motivations and inform themselves in a way that is more robust and disciplined than internet-driven dialog has been until now.
Me writing this for you by myself is already more than you deserve.
Any ideas I share here won't reach you because you argue in bad faith since your support for the kremlin is "the truth" and any empirical or contextual truths you utterly ignore and trample in the process is of no concern to you since your truth is mythical and not actual.
You're the comments section equivalent of a barking dog, a streaker in a stadium, there is no value in your input beyond disruption and the sharing of your own pathetic and deluded worldview that can't even stand up to alleged AIslop.